petition under 13-B is not barred by rule of estoppel Allahabad High Court

AFR Court No. – 58 Reserved Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. – 7414 of 2015 Petitioner :- Ashish Kumar Srivastava Respondent :-Smt. Ankita Srivastava Counsel for Petitioner :-Siddhartha Varma, Anup Kumar Srivastava, S.K. Varma Counsel for Respondent:- Dhirendra Pratap Singh, H.M.B. Sinha Hon’ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. 1. Heard Sri S.K. Varma, Senior Read More …

Giving false evidence in fir leads perjury

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.  266 OF 2007 Shriram Munjaji Raut, age 55 years, occ. Labour, r/o Shendra, Taluka and District Parbhani …Appellant [Original Witness No.2 in Sessions Case] VERSUS The State of Maharashtra  …Respondent ….. Shri  Joydeep Chatterjee, advocate for appellant (original accused) Smt. Y.M.Kshirsagar, A.P.P.  for respondent/State ….. CORAM  :    SHRIHARI  P.DAVARE, J. DATED   :    14th  March, 2011 ORAL JUDGMENT  :­ 1 This appeal is directed against the judgment and order, dated 29.6.2007, rendered by the learned Sessions Judge, Parbhani, in   Criminal   Miscellaneous   Application   No.   18   of   2007,   thereby punishing the appellant under Section 344 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for giving false evidence in Sessions Trial No. 8 of 2006, and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months and to pay fine of Rs.500/­, in default, rigorous imprisonment for seven days. 2 cra266.07 2 The factual matrix, which gave rise for the present appeal, can be summarised as under :­ Pursuant to the complaint lodged by the first informant, namely   Shrirang   Read More …

rights of the defendant when his defence is struck off Supreme Court

PETITIONER: MODULA INDIA Vs. RESPONDENT: KAMAKSHYA SINGH DEO DATE OF JUDGMENT27/09/1988 BENCH: RANGNATHAN, S. BENCH: RANGNATHAN, S. MUKHARJI, SABYASACHI (J) CITATION: 1989 AIR 162 1988 SCR Supl. (3) 333 1988 SCC (4) 619 JT 1988 (4) 214 1988 SCALE (2)1163 ACT: West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956-Section 17(3) of–Nature and scope of rights of defendant Read More …

duty of the court to produce witness in criminal case bombay HC

Bombay High Court 1 crra379.02 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 379 OF 2002 1] Shankar s/o Shivappa Patale, age 55 years, occ. Agril., 2] Shivraj s/o Shankar Patale, age 27 years, occ. Agril.., Both R/o Murum, Tq.Omerga, Dist. Osmanabad …Applicants [No.1 Complainant & No.2 Injured] Read More …

oral evidence in the absence of the pleadings has to be ignored bombay HC

Bombay High Court IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD APPELLATE SIDE, APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.: 605 OF 2005 … 1. Laxuman S/o Dadarao Bodake, Age: 75 yrs., Occu.: Agriculture, 2. Dhanraj S/o Laxumanrao Bodke, Age: 34 yrs., Occu.: Agri., 3. Yuvraj S/o Laxumanrao Bodke, Age: 32 yrs., Occu.: Agri., Read More …

Electronic records proved in the manner required under Section 65 B of the Indian Evidence Act is admissible chatisgarh hc

1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR ——————————————————————————— DB: HON’BLE SHRI YATINDRA SINGH, CJ & HON’BLE SHRI PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J. ——————————————————————————— Criminal Reference No.2 of 2013 Office Reference Vs. Govind Chandra & others AND Criminal Appeal No.374 of 2013 Govind Chandra & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh ————————————————————————————— Present: Smt. Fouzia Mirza, counsel for the Read More …

KANS RAJ VS STATE OF PUNJAB

CASE NO.: Appeal (crl.) 688-90 of 1993 PETITIONER: KANS RAJ Vs. RESPONDENT: STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/04/2000 BENCH: G.B. Pattanaik, R.P. Sethi, & Shivaraj V. Patil. JUDGMENT: SETHI,J. L…I…T…….T…….T…….T…….T…….T…….T..J Sunita Kumari married on 9th July, 1985 was found dead on 23rd October, 1988 at the residence of her in-laws at Batala Read More …