order 39 rule 2A consequences of non compliance of order by Judgement debtor

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR DIRECTION) NO. 6510 of 2015 In CIVIL APPLICATION NO.  4112 of 2015 In APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 8 of 2012 [On note for speaking to minutes of order dated 16/03/2016 in C/CA/6510/2015 ] ======================================================== VELBAI W/O NARAN NARSANI AND D/O NATHA HARJI HALAI….Applicant(s) Versus NATHA HARJI HALAI  &  13….Respondent(s) ========================================================= Appearance: MR AR THACKER, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1 ADVANCE COPY SERVED TO GP/PP for the Respondent(s) No. 13 MR HS MUNSHAW, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 14 MR MEHULSHARAD SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 10 ­ 12 MR RC KAKKAD, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 2 ­ 4 MS KARUNA V RAHEVAR, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 5 ­ 9 NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================= CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.D.KOTHARI Date : 22/03/2016 ORDER ON SPEAKING TO MINUTES NOTE 1. The applicant has filed a note for speaking to minutes drawing attention of the Court that in paragraph no. 16 by error, it is stated “……..  applicant  no.   10  is  hereby   directed   to  undergo   7  days’   civil Page 1 of 2 1 of 29 HC-NIC Read More …

Principle of estoppel Kerala High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.JYOTHINDRANATH TUESDAY,THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2016/28TH ASHADHA, 1938 MACA.No. 1008 of 2013 () ————————- AGAINST THE AWARD IN OPMV 617/2010 OF PRINCIPAL MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL,KOZHIKODE DATED 22-06-2012 APPELLANT/PETITIONER:-: ————————- DEVI.T.,AGED 40 YEARS, W/O.BHASKARAN, KARIMBANGOTTU MEETHAL Read More …

Cause Of Action Kerala High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JULY 2016/3RD SRAVANA, 1938 FAO.No. 129 of 2016 () ———————– AGAINST THE ORDER/FINDING ON ISSUE NO. 2 IN OS 37/2014 of III ADDL.SUB COURT, KOZHIKODE DATED 15-02-2016 APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: ——————————— FAMECO ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS Read More …

Judgment Debtor has willfully failed to obey Civil court can order detention : Bombay HC

  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 69 OF 2011 1. Prakash S/o Bala Dubele, Age 36 years, Occu. Agril., R/o Dahegaon, Tq. Kannad, Dist. Aurangabad. 2. Sandeep S/o Bala Dubele, Age 31 years, Occu. Agril., R/o Dahegaon, Tq. Kannad, Dist. Aurangabad. ..APPLICANTS. VERSUS Janabai W/o Read More …

clubbing of cross petitions under HMA : Rajasthan high court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. JUDGMENT Prakash vs. Smt. Kavita D.B Civil Misc. Appeal No.911/06 under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, 1984 against the judgment dated 18.05.2006 passed by learned Judge, Family Court, Jodhpur in Civil Original Case Nos.162/2000 & 38/2001. Date of Judgment: April 30th,2008. PRESENT HON’BLE Read More …

Amendment in pleadings allowed before commencement of trial : punjab and haryana high court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.3295 of 2013 Reserved on : 08.05.2015 Date of decision: 15.05.2015 Shiv Kumar Bhandari ….Petitioner Versus Kailash Soni and another …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA Present: Mr. M.S.Sachdev, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arun Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sudhir Pruthi, Advocate and Read More …

order 18 rule 3a Petitioners witness must start with the prtitioner: punjab and haryana high court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (1) CR No. 3595 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision: March 30, 2015 Jasvir Singh and another …Petitioners Versus Jaspal Singh …Respondent (2) CR No. 8375 of 2014 (O&M) Jasvir Singh and another …Petitioners Versus Jaspal Singh …Respondent CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN 1. Read More …