HC upholds divorce on grounds of False 498A: Bomabay HC 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 150 OF 2008 Mrs. Christine Lazarus Menezes ….Appellant V/S Mr. Lazarus Peter Menezes ….Respondent ALONGWITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.368 OF 2008 Mrs. Christine Lazarus Menezes …Applicant V/S Mr, Lazarus Peter Menezes …Respondent Mr Amogh Singh a/w Mr. Jeet Gandhi Read More …

Divorce decree on the grounds of desertion: Kerala High Court 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHIRCY V. FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF APRIL 2018 / 23RD CHAITHRA, 1940 Mat.Appeal.No. 260 of 2006 AGAINST THE ORDER IN OP 895/2003 of FAMILY COURT,ERNAKULAM DATED 26-03-2005 APPELLANT/PETITIONER UNNI, AGED 46 S/O. MADHAVAN, KALATHARA, VADAKKUMBHAGOM,, ELOOR, Read More …

wife’s allegation of Infidelity amount to cruelty: Delhi HC 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 9th April, 2018 MAT.APP. 62/2011 & C.M. Nos. 16979/2011, 19900/2016, 28099/2016 and 5315/2017 R ….. Petitioner Through: Ms. Reena Jain Malhotra, Advocate along with petitioner present in person versus J ….. Respondent Through: Ms. Vandana Sharma, Advocate along with respondent present in person Read More …

Court cannot compel a person for divorce with mutual consent: Delhi HC 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 15.05.2018 + REFERENCE IN CONT.CAS(C) 772/2013, 347/2013, 484/2014, 584/2014, 648/2014, 48/2016, 483/2016, 484/2016, 1147/2016, 1116/2016, 1251/2016, 78/2017, 132/2017, 197/2017, 204/2017, 216/2017 and 270/2017 IN THE MATTER OF: RAJAT GUPTA ….. Petitioner in CONT.CAS(C) 772/2013 MANPREET SINGH BHATIA ….. Petitioner in CONT.CAS(C) 347/2013 DEEPAK Read More …

If the marriage is not a valid marriage, it is no marriage in the eye of law: Supreme Court 1965

PETITIONER: BHAURAO SHANKAR LOKHANDE & ANR. Vs. RESPONDENT: STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/02/1965 BENCH: DAYAL, RAGHUBAR BENCH: DAYAL, RAGHUBAR MUDHOLKAR, J.R. RAMASWAMI, V. CITATION: 1965 AIR 1564 1965 SCR (2) 837 CITATOR INFO : R 1966 SC 614 (6,8) R 1971 SC1153 (14) R 1979 SC 713 (5) ACT: Indian Penal Read More …

False allegations of illicit relations with Bhabhi is cruelty: Delhi HC 2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decided on: 23.02.2018 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 2/2018, CM Nos. 64/2018 (stay), 65/2018 (Exemption) and CM No. 66/2018 (Condonation of delay in filing the appeal) S. ….. Appellant Through: Mr Imran Ali and Mr Johar Adeeb, Advs. versus M.K. ….. Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Read More …

wife cannot enter husbands house forcefully: Calcutta High Court 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Appellate/Revisional/Civil Jurisdiction Present: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Bhattacharya And The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rudrendra Nath Banerjee F.A. No. 96 of 2000 Sri Subhash Chandra Das Chowdhury Versus Smt. Sandhya Das Chowdhury For the Appellant/Petitioner: Mr Dilip Kumar Mondal, Mr Sandip Roy Chowdhury, Mr Gurudas Mitra. For the Respondent/Opposite Read More …

False allegations by wife a ground for divorce: Bombay HC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.29 OF 2014 Pradeep Singh s/o Jagdish Singh, Aged about 39 years, Occupation­Govt. Servant, Resident of Plot No.2,  Allied Society, Anant Nagar, Nagpur­440 013. .. Appellant                           [Original Petitioner] .. Versus .. Smt. Nisharani Rajput w/o Pradeep Singh, Aged about 37 years, Occupation­Household, Resident of Rani Durgawati Ward, 894­Dogra Compound, Garha, Jabalpur (M.P.) .. Respondent           [Original Respondent] ………. Ms. R.A. Deshpande, counsel for the appellant, Ms. A.K. Shukul, counsel for the respondent. ………. CORAM :  SMT. VASANTI   A  NAIK  AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ. DATED  :  AUGUST 20, 2016. ORAL JUDGMENT :   (Per : SMT. VASANTI   A  NAIK, J.) By   this   Family   Court   Appeal,   the   appellant   challenges   the judgment   of   the   Family Read More …

Evidence of a Tutored child witness in a matrimonial dispute: Punjab and Haryana High Court 2014

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.9-M of 2003 Date of Decision:22.08.2014 Jai Gopal .Appellant Versus Maya Rani .Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. SARON HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NAVITA SINGH Present: Mr. Nipun Mittal, Advocate, for the appellant with appellant-Jai Gopal in person. Mr. Ajit Sihag, Advocate, for the Read More …