Person not possession of device not required to give certificate as per 65(b) of evidence act: Supreme Court 2018

Accordingly, we clarify the legal position on the subject on the admissibility of the electronic evidence, especially by a party who is not in possession of device from which the document is produced. Such party cannot be required to produce certificate under Section 65B(4) of the Evidence Act. The applicability of requirement of certificate being Read More …

Evidentiary value of suggestions: Supreme Court 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 473 of 1996 In FIRST APPEAL NO. 5952 of 1995 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA ========================================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? YES 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? Read More …

when does burden of proof sifts Sec 106 Evidence Act: Supreme Court 2006

  CASE NO.: Appeal (crl.) 745 of 2000 PETITIONER: State of Rajasthan RESPONDENT: Kashi Ram DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/11/2006 BENCH: B.P. Singh & Tarun Chatterjee JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T   B.P. Singh, J   This appeal by special leave has been preferred by the State of Rajasthan against the common Read More …

Electronic evidence section 65b : Supreme court 2018

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1418 of 2013 SONU @ AMAR …. Appellant(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA ….Respondent(s) With CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1416 of 2013 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1653 of 2014 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1652 of 2014 J U D G M E N T L. NAGESWARA RAO, Read More …

Breaking News: Supreme Court Issues New Guidelines To Prevent Misuse of 498A IPC, No More Automatic Arrest in 498a before Committee Report

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1265 OF 2017 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.2013 of 2017] Rajesh Sharma & ors. …Appellants Versus State of U.P. & Anr. …Respondents J U D G M E N T Adarsh Kumar Goel, J. Leave granted. The question which Read More …

Domestic Relationship is Necessary to Permit a Party to Occupy “Shared Household” : Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION   CIVIL APPEAL NO.2500 OF 2017   Manmohan Attavar                                                    …Appellants   Versus   Neelam Manmohan Attavar                                     …Respondents   WITH   CIVIL APPEAL NO.2502 OF 2017   J U D G M E N T SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.   The appellant is 84 years old Read More …

evidentiary value of a news report: Himachal HC 2015

High Court of H.P. IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3231 of 2014 Judgment reserved on : 15.10.2015 Date of decision: October 27, 2015. Private Bus Operator Welfare Society …Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and others ..Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Whether approved for reporting ?1 Read More …

hearsay evidence is no evidence: Supreme Court 2011

The reasons why hearsay evidence is not received as relevant evidence are: (a) the person giving such evidence does not feel any responsibility. The law requires all evidence to be given under personal responsibility, i.e., every witness must give his testimony, under such circumstance, as expose him to all the penalties of falsehood. If the Read More …

CD is an electronic record : Madhya pradesh HC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR E.P.No.01/2014 Sharadendu Tiwari Vs. Ajay Arjun Singh and others. Present: Hon’ble Shri Justice C.V. Sirpurkar …………………………………………………………………………………………………… Shri Prakash Upadhyay, counsel for the petitioner. Shri P.D. Gupta, counsel for the respondent No.1. None for the remaining respondents. …………………………………………………………………………………………………. O R D E R (17-1-2017) 1. Read More …