original record itself produced in Court under Section 62, is admissible without compliance with the conditions in Section 65(b): Madras HC

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.05.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.BASHEER AHAMED Crl.RC(MD)No.497 of 2016 and CRL MP(MD)No.5946 of 2016 Orders Reserved on 02.11.2016 1.Karuppasamy 2.Karuppaiah 3.Seetha 4.Sagunthala 5.Kottimuthal : Petitioners / Respondents Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Srivilliputhur : Respondent Read More …

In order to base conviction on the solitary testimony of a witness, the evidence must be clear, cogent, truthful, absolutely reliable and above board and it should inspire confidence : Orissa High Court-Cuttack.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Criminal Appeal No. 238 of 1991 From the judgment and order dated 24.08.1991 passed by Sessions Judge, Dhenkanal in S.T. Case No.62-D of 1987. —————————- Umesh Pani and Others ……… Appellants -VersusState of Orissa ……… Respondent For Appellants: – Mr. Baibaswata Panigrahi For Respondent: – Mr.Prem Kumar Patnaik Read More …

Electronic evidence CCTV footage: Delhi High Court 2016

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 108/2013 Reserved on: 19th October, 2015 % Date of Decision: 12th February, 2016 KISHAN TRIPATHI @ KISHAN PAINTER ….Appellant Through Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate. Versus THE STATE …Respondent Through Mr. Varun Goswami, APP. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON’BLE MR. Read More …

Admisibilty of a certified copy as evidence in courts: Supreme Court 2014

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 8879-8880 OF 2011 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 2708-09 of 2008 Jaswant Singh …. Appellant (s) Versus Gurdev Singh & Ors. …. Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T P. Sathasivam, J. 1) Leave granted. 2) These appeals are Read More …

Finding of harassment would not mean there is abetment of suicide: Supreme Court 2017

in the facts of this case, it has been concurrently found that the in-laws did harass her, but harassment is something of a lesser degree than cruelty. Also, we find on the facts, taken as a whole, that assuming the presumption under Section 113A would apply, it has been fully rebutted, for the reason that Read More …

Protection in court against self incrimination: Supreme Court 2015

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 454 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP (Criminal) No.9928 of 2014) R. Dineshkumar @ Deena …Appellant Versus State Rep. by Inspector of Police & Others …Respondents J U D G M E N T Chelameswar, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. One Vijayan Read More …

Electronic evidence in matrimonial disputes: Bombay High Court 2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Notice of Motion No.8 of 2010 IN Suit No.16 of 2008 Mrs.Havovi Kersi Sethna … … Plaintiff v/s. Mr.Kersi Gustad Sethna … … Defendant Mr.Narayan Suvarna i/by Mrs.Ansuya Dutt for Plaintiff. Ms.Taubon F. Irani for Defendant. —– CORAM : SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J. Date of reserving the Read More …

Secondary evidence relating to contents of a document is inadmissible until non production of original is accounted for: Supreme Court 2012

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 8927-8928 OF 2012 [Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) Nos. 37449-37450 of 2012 ( CC.5877-5878 of 2012)] U. Sree … Appellant Versus U. Srinivas … Respondent J U D G M E N T Dipak Misra, J. Leave granted. 2. The appellant-wife instituted Read More …

Secondary evidence allowed when court record destroyed: Bombay high Court 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1290 OF 2010 Shri Kailash S/o. Mannalal Jindal, Aged about 49 years, Occu. Business, R/o. 125, R.N.T. Marg, Indore-452 001. Applicant.. (Orig. Accused No. 1) VERSUS The State of Maharashtra, At the instance of Jugal Kishor Mantri, Drugs Inspector, Bhandara. Respondent.. Read More …

contradictions in previous statements in writing Section 145: Supreme Court 2016

Non- Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 14 OF 2016 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.703 of 2015) KRISHAN CHANDER …APPELLANT Versus STATE OF DELHI …RESPONDENT J U D G M E N T V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. Leave granted. This criminal appeal is directed against the impugned Read More …