in compliance of that order without applying his mind summoned the accused by the impugned order is also not justified: Allahabad HC

Generally, the husband is only responsible for security, welfare and maintenance but the practice is that all family members were implicated in this case even no over act has been assigned to in-laws. The Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Geeta Mehrotra and another vs. State of U.P. and another, 2012 Law Suit (SC) 716 Read More …

the allegations are absurd and have been levelled to make the case more grave: MP high Court 2017

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR SINGLE BENCH BEFORE JUSTICE S.K.AWASTHI Misc. Criminal Case No 2360/2014 Kunaldev Singh Rathor and others Versus State of MP and another ——————————————————————- Shri Ajeet Singh Bhadoriya, learned counsel for the applicants. Shri R.D.Agarwal, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent No.1/State. Shri R.K.Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent Read More …

Distant relatives aged 78 and 88 accused in 498a quashed: Gujarat High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR QUASHING & SET ASIDE FIR/ORDER) NO. 9064 of 2015 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA ========================================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ? 3 Whether their Read More …

meticulous examination even at the stage of cognizance and issue of summons: Patna High Court

meticulous examination even at the stage of cognizance and issue of summons should be done in the cases of section 498-A Indian Penal Code so that the entire family members are not embroiled in unnecessary litigation.     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA NEETI RANI @ NEETI KUMARI, Daughter of Sri Ram Read More …

financial assistance is not dowry : Madras High Court 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 22.7.2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.BASHA Crl.A.No.1036 of 2003 Nagararajan .. Appellant/Accused No.1 Vs State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Sembiam Police Station, Chennai-10 .. Respondent/Complainant Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 18.5.2003 made in S.C.No.167/2003 on the file Read More …

498A acquittal As Prosecution Failed to Prove the case Punjab and haryana High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.Revision No.900 of 2005 (O&M) Date of decision : 09.2.2010 Sudha … Petitioner Versus Narender Nagpal and others …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr.Ashish Handa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.R.S.Sihota, Sr.Advocate with Mr.B.S.Rana, Advocate for the respondents. Sabina J. Petitioner Read More …