single incident of verbal exchange is not cruelty: Supreme Court 2017

Page 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos.7114-7115 OF 2014 Suman Singh ….Appellant(s) VERSUS Sanjay Singh …Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. 1) These appeals are filed by the appellant (wife) against the final judgment and order dated 23.05.2013 passed by the Read More …

can use video conferencing instead of summoning the husband to the place where wife resides: Supreme Court 2017

In matrimonial or custody matters or in proceedings between parties to a marriage or arising out of disputes between parties to a marriage, wherever the defendants/respondents are located outside the jurisdiction of the court, the court where proceedings are instituted, may examine whether it is in the interest of justice to incorporate any safeguards for Read More …

Divorce to husband on grounds of false case of 498a: Delhi High Court 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 20, 2016 % Judgment Delivered on: October 25, 2016 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 123/2014 PUSHKAR GUPTA ….. Appellant Represented by: Mr.Shailender Dahiya, Adv. with appellant in person versus NARENDER KUMAR GUPTA ….. Respondent Represented by: Mr.Naveen Kumar Raheja, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP Read More …

Electronic evidence in matrimonial disputes: Bombay High Court 2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Notice of Motion No.8 of 2010 IN Suit No.16 of 2008 Mrs.Havovi Kersi Sethna … … Plaintiff v/s. Mr.Kersi Gustad Sethna … … Defendant Mr.Narayan Suvarna i/by Mrs.Ansuya Dutt for Plaintiff. Ms.Taubon F. Irani for Defendant. —– CORAM : SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J. Date of reserving the Read More …

Leaving the matrimonial house time and again without informing the husband, and staying away for days is cruelty: Bombay High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. FAMILY COURT APPEAL  NO.  142   OF    2014 APPELLANT (Ori.Peti):­ Ulhas   Prabhakar   Chinchanikar,   aged   51 years,   r/o   Nagoba   Galli   No.1,   Chitar   Oli, Nagpur 440002. …VERSUS… RESPONDENT :­ Mrs.Radhika w/o Ulhas Chinchanikar, aged (Ori.Resp.) 48   years,   occupation   service,   Bhartiya Aadim Jati Seva Sangh, Khamla, Nagpur. C/o Manasi Girls Hostel, Plot No.10, Tilak Nagar,   Behind   Nagpur   Amravati   Road, Nagpur­10. ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Mr. A.V.Khare, counsel for the appellant. None for the respondent. Read More …

Divorce on false complaint of Domestic Violence: Delhi High Court

proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was a contrived afterthought, and was completely “ill advised”. The same was a false complaint filed by the respondent-wife knowingly and intentionally calculated to embarass the appellant and his family members. The filing of such a false and frivolous complaint tantamount to causing mental Read More …

false allegations of sexual perversion is cruelty: Delhi High Court

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 24, 2016 % Judgment Delivered on: October 27, 2016 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 129/2016 JAYANTI ….. Appellant Represented by: Mr.Manjit Singh Chauhan, Advocate. versus RAKESH MEDIRATTA ….. Respondent Represented by: Mr.Sunil Mittal, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.Dhruv Grover and Mr.R.K.Bedi, Advocates. CORAM: HON’BLE Read More …

Suicide attempts and implication of in laws is cruelty- Delhi High Court

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: October 21, 2016 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 89/2016 RAJENDER KUMAR ….. Appellant Represented by: Mr.Balkishan, Advocate. versus NANDINI & ANR. ….. Respondent Represented by: None. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J. (Oral) 1. Notice sent Read More …

Demanding Separate house from husband is cruelty Bombay High Court

Bombay High Court fca353.14.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.353/2014 APPELLANT : Yogesh Arun Sonawane Aged : 36 Years, Occp. : Architect R/o Plot No.A­3, Tarkeshwar Kunj Apartment, Anand Nagar, Suncity Road, Pune – 411 051. …Versus… RESPONDENT:     Sau. Jyostna Yogesh Sonawane Aged : 34 Years, Occp. : Architect R/o C/o Manohar Motiram Wane, Swavlambi Nagar, Gaurakshan Road, Akola. ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Shri U.J. Deshpande, Advocate for appellant Shri J.B. Gandhi, Advocate for respondent ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ CORAM  :  SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE      : 07.04.2015 ORAL JUDGMENT :  (PER : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK , J.) Admit. Heard finally with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties as record and proceedings are received. By   this   appeal,   the   appellant   ­   husband   challenges   the judgment  of  the  family  Court,  Akola   Read More …