Person not possession of device not required to give certificate as per 65(b) of evidence act: Supreme Court 2018

Accordingly, we clarify the legal position on the subject on the admissibility of the electronic evidence, especially by a party who is not in possession of device from which the document is produced. Such party cannot be required to produce certificate under Section 65B(4) of the Evidence Act. The applicability of requirement of certificate being Read More …

Electronic evidence section 65b : Supreme court 2018

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1418 of 2013 SONU @ AMAR …. Appellant(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA ….Respondent(s) With CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1416 of 2013 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1653 of 2014 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1652 of 2014 J U D G M E N T L. NAGESWARA RAO, Read More …

CD is an electronic record : Madhya pradesh HC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR E.P.No.01/2014 Sharadendu Tiwari Vs. Ajay Arjun Singh and others. Present: Hon’ble Shri Justice C.V. Sirpurkar …………………………………………………………………………………………………… Shri Prakash Upadhyay, counsel for the petitioner. Shri P.D. Gupta, counsel for the respondent No.1. None for the remaining respondents. …………………………………………………………………………………………………. O R D E R (17-1-2017) 1. Read More …

original record itself produced in Court under Section 62, is admissible without compliance with the conditions in Section 65(b): Madras HC

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.05.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.BASHEER AHAMED Crl.RC(MD)No.497 of 2016 and CRL MP(MD)No.5946 of 2016 Orders Reserved on 02.11.2016 1.Karuppasamy 2.Karuppaiah 3.Seetha 4.Sagunthala 5.Kottimuthal : Petitioners / Respondents Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Srivilliputhur : Respondent Read More …

Electronic evidence CCTV footage: Delhi High Court 2016

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 108/2013 Reserved on: 19th October, 2015 % Date of Decision: 12th February, 2016 KISHAN TRIPATHI @ KISHAN PAINTER ….Appellant Through Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate. Versus THE STATE …Respondent Through Mr. Varun Goswami, APP. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON’BLE MR. Read More …

Electronic evidence in matrimonial disputes: Bombay High Court 2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Notice of Motion No.8 of 2010 IN Suit No.16 of 2008 Mrs.Havovi Kersi Sethna … … Plaintiff v/s. Mr.Kersi Gustad Sethna … … Defendant Mr.Narayan Suvarna i/by Mrs.Ansuya Dutt for Plaintiff. Ms.Taubon F. Irani for Defendant. —– CORAM : SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J. Date of reserving the Read More …

Electronic record inadmissible without 65B certificate: Supreme Court 2016

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2539 OF 2014 HARPAL SINGH @ CHHOTA …APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB …RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 388 OF 2015 SUKHMEET SINGH @ DEPUTY …APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB …RESPONDENT J U D G M E N T AMITAVA ROY, J. The Read More …