Secondary evidence allowed when court record destroyed: Bombay high Court 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1290 OF 2010 Shri Kailash S/o. Mannalal Jindal, Aged about 49 years, Occu. Business, R/o. 125, R.N.T. Marg, Indore-452 001. Applicant.. (Orig. Accused No. 1) VERSUS The State of Maharashtra, At the instance of Jugal Kishor Mantri, Drugs Inspector, Bhandara. Respondent.. Read More …

contradictions in previous statements in writing Section 145: Supreme Court 2016

Non- Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 14 OF 2016 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.703 of 2015) KRISHAN CHANDER …APPELLANT Versus STATE OF DELHI …RESPONDENT J U D G M E N T V. GOPALA GOWDA, J. Leave granted. This criminal appeal is directed against the impugned Read More …

evidence collected by proper improper means is admissible Supreme Court

Page 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOs.1357-1358 of 2011 Madhu @ Madhuranatha & Anr. …Appellants Versus State of Karnataka …Respondent With Criminal Appeal No.109 of 2013 J U D G M E N T Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J. 1. These criminal appeals have been preferred against the impugned Read More …