Court cannot completely act on the basis of its own assumption and surmises while deciding maintenance to wife: Bombay HC 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3553 OF 2018 Mr.Prakash Kumar Singhee …Petitioner Versus Ms.Amrapali Singhee …Respondent WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.459 OF 2017 Ms.Amrapali Singhee …Petitioner Versus Mr.Prakash Kumar Singhee …Respondent Mrs.Seema Sarnaik for the Petitioner in WP No.3553 of 2018 and for the Respondent in CP No.459 of 2017. Mr.Abhijit Sarwate for the Respondent in WP No.3553 of 2018 and for the Petitioner in CP No.459 of 2017. CORAM : SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE, J. RESERVED ON : 23rd MARCH 2018 PRONOUNCED ON : 4th MAY 2018 JUDGMENT : 1. The present Writ Petition is filed by the petitionerhusband, challenging order passed by the Family Court, Pune below Exh.20 in Petition B. No.2/2013, thereby directing the petitioner to pay maintenance of Rs.2 lakhs to the wife under Section 20 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 from the date of application till the decision of the petition.F 2. Contempt Petition No.459 of 2017 is taken out by the wife alleging noncompliance of the said order passed by the Family Court and Read More …