Court cannot completely act on the basis of its own assumption and surmises while deciding maintenance to wife: Bombay HC 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION      WRIT PETITION NO. 3553 OF 2018 Mr.Prakash Kumar Singhee …Petitioner Versus Ms.Amrapali Singhee …Respondent WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.459 OF 2017 Ms.Amrapali Singhee …Petitioner Versus Mr.Prakash Kumar Singhee …Respondent ­­­­ Mrs.Seema Sarnaik for the Petitioner in WP No.3553 of 2018 and for the Respondent in CP No.459 of 2017. Mr.Abhijit Sarwate for the Respondent in WP No.3553 of 2018 and for the Petitioner in CP No.459 of 2017. ­­­­ CORAM : SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE, J. RESERVED ON : 23rd MARCH 2018 PRONOUNCED ON : 4th MAY 2018 JUDGMENT :­ 1. The   present   Writ   Petition   is   filed   by   the   petitionerhusband, challenging order passed by the Family Court, Pune below Exh.20 in Petition B. No.2/2013, thereby directing the petitioner to pay maintenance of Rs.2 lakhs to the wife under Section 20 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 from the date of application till the decision of the petition.F 2. Contempt Petition No.459 of 2017 is taken out by the wife alleging non­compliance of the said order passed by the Family Court   and Read More …

Wife to pay 20000 per month and provide ZEN car to husband: Delhi HC 2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on: 31.03.2011 RANI SETHI ….. Petitioner Through : Mr. G.K. Sharma, Adv. versus SUNIL SETHI ….. Respondent Through : Mr. B.P. Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI 1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2. Read More …

Maintenance dismissed with costs due to suppression of facts : Delhi HC 2010

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve: January 07, 2010 Date of Order: January 25, 2010 + Cont. Cas(C) 482 of 2008 % 25.01.2010 Gurbinder Singh …Petitioner Through: Mr. V.M. Issar, Advocates Versus Manjit Kaur …Respondents Through: Mr. Anish Dhingra, Advocate along with respondent in person. JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN Read More …

no parallel domestic violence and 125 Crpc cases for maintenance: Delhi High Court 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve: 22nd September, 2010 Date of Order: September 27, 2010 +CRL. R.P. No. 633 of 2010, CRL. M.A. NO. 15451/2010 % 27.09.2010 RENU MITTAL … Petitioner Through: Mr Shiv Charan Garg with Mr. Imran Kha, Advs. Versus ANIL MITTAL & ORS. … Respondents Through: Read More …

Woman’s property and income must be considered in CrPC 125: Supreme Court 2008

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4666 OF 2008 ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.17260 OF 2007 SHAIL KUMARI DEVI & ANR. … APPELLANTS VERSUS KRISHAN BHAGWAN PATHAK @ KISHUN B. PATHAK … RESPONDENT J U D G M E N T C.K. THAKKER, J. 1. Read More …

Maintenance denied to doctor wife capable of earning: Punjab and Haryana High Court

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Criminal Revision No. 2625 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.09.2016 Monu Songra ….Petitioner Versus Pinki ….Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY Present: Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. P.K.Ganga, Advocate for the respondent. **** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J(ORAL) The petitioner has assailed Read More …

Both parents should maintain a child: Supreme Court 2000

Under Section 18 of the Maintenance Act a Hindu wife shall be entitled to be maintained by her husband during her life time. This is of course subject to certain conditions with which we are not concerned. Section 20* provides for maintenance of children and aged parents. Under this Section a Hindu is bound, during Read More …

Prosecute wife for blatantly lying in court to claim Maintenance: Gujarat High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (QUASHING) NO. 7666 of 2016 ========================================================== SEJALBEN TEJASBHAI CHOVATIYA….Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT….Respondent(s) ========================================================== Appearance: MR K S CHANDRANI, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR RONAK RAVAL, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI Date Read More …

Expenses of the husband working abroad to be considered as per living standards of that country: Delhi High Court

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: September 29, 2016 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 63/2015 MS BINDU CHAUDHARY ….. Appellant Represented by: Mr.P.Acharya, Advocate versus SHRI DEEPAK SUGA ….. Respondent Represented by: Ms.Shikha Sapra, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J. (Oral) Read More …